Choose a poem FROM THE TEXT we have NOT studied and write a 3-5 page explication.

Choose a poem FROM THE TEXT we have NOT studied and write a 3-5 page explication.

A poetry explication
is a relatively short analysis which describes the possible meanings
and relationships of the words, images, and other small units that make
up a poem. Writing an explication is an effective way for a reader to
connect a poem’s plot and conflicts with its structural features.

Some things to cover in your paper:

Determine the basic design of the poem by considering the who, what, when, where, and why of the dramatic situation.

What is being dramatized? What conflicts or themes does the poem present, address, or question?

  • Who
    is the speaker? Define and describe the speaker and his/her voice. What
    does the speaker say? Who is the audience? Are other characters
    involved?
  • What happens in the poem? Consider the plot or
    basic design of the action. How are the dramatized conflicts or themes
    introduced, sustained, resolved, etc.?
  • When does the action occur? What is the date and/or time of day?
  • Where is the speaker? Describe the physical location of the dramatic moment.
  • Why does the speaker feel compelled to speak at this moment? What is his/her motivation?
  • Finally,
    spend some time online and research both the poem and its author to see
    if this will yield some important additional information. Be sure to
    list the sources of any additional information you uncover in case your
    readers are interested in pursuing your leads. MLA style

Things to Consider In the Explication

Consider the poem as a dramatic situation in
which a speaker addresses an audience or another character. In this
way, begin your analysis by identifying and describing the speaking
voice or voices, the conflicts or ideas, and the language used in the
poem.

In the middle paragraphs mention such devices as attention to the plot, narrative, conflict, images, symbols, metaphors, and controlling ideas.

Writing the Explication

The
explication should follow the same format as the preparation: begin
with the large issues and basic design of the poem and work through each
line to the more specific details and patterns.

The First Paragraph

The
first paragraph should present the large issues; it should inform the
reader which conflicts are dramatized and should describe the dramatic
situation of the speaker. The explication does not require a formal
introductory paragraph; the writer should simply start explicating
immediately. According to UNC ‘s Professor William Harmon, the foolproof
way to begin any explication is with the following sentence: “This poem
dramatizes the conflict between …” Such a beginning ensures that you
will introduce the major conflict or theme in the poem and organize your
explication accordingly.

An undergraduate recently began an explication of Wordsworth’s “Composed upon Westminster Bridge” in the following way:

This
poem dramatizes the conflict between appearance and reality,
particularly as this conflict relates to what the speaker seems to say
and what he really says. From Westminster Bridge, the speaker looks at
London at sunrise, and he explains that all people should be struck by
such a beautiful scene. The speaker notes that the city is silent, and
he points to several specific objects, naming them only in general
terms: “Ships, towers, domes, theatres, and temples” (6). After
describing the “glittering” aspect of these objects, he asserts that
these city places are just as beautiful in the morning as country places
like “valley, rock, or hill” (8,10). Finally, after describing his deep
feeling of calmness, the speaker notes how the “houses seem asleep” and
that “all that mighty heart is lying still” (13, 14). In this way, the
speaker seems to say simply that London looks beautiful in the morning.

The Next Paragraphs

The
next paragraphs should expand the discussion of the conflict by
focusing on details of form, rhetoric, syntax, and vocabulary. In these
paragraphs, the writer should explain the poem line by line in terms of
these details, and he or she should incorporate important elements of
rhyme, rhythm, and meter during this discussion.

The undergraduate continues with a topic sentence that directs the discussion of the first five lines:

However,
the poem begins with several oddities that suggest the speaker is
saying more than what he seems to say initially. For example, the poem
is an Italian sonnet and follows the abbaabbacdcdcd rhyme
scheme. The fact that the poet chooses to write a sonnet about London in
an Italian form suggests that what he says may not be actually praising
the city. Also, the rhetoric of the first two lines seems awkward
compared to a normal speaking voice: “Earth has not anything to show
more fair. / Dull would he be of soul who could pass by” (1-2). The odd
syntax continues when the poet personifies the city: “This City now
doth, like a garment, wear / The beauty of the morning” (4-5). Here, the
city wears the morning’s beauty, so it is not the city but the morning
that is beautiful …

The Conclusion??

The explication has no formal concluding paragraph; do
not simply restate the main points of the introduction! The end of the
explication should focus on sound effects or visual patterns as the
final element of asserting an explanation. Or, as does the undergraduate
here, the writer may choose simply to stop writing when he or she
reaches the end of the poem:

The poem ends with a vague statement: “And all that mighty heart is lying still!” In this line, the
city’s heart could be dead, or it could be simply deceiving the one
observing the scene. In this way, the poet reinforces the conflict
between the appearance of the city in the morning and what such a scene
and his words actually reveal.

Tips to keep in mind

  1. Refer to the speaking voice in the poem as “the speaker” or “the poet.” For
    example, do not write, “In this poem, Wordsworth says that London is
    beautiful in the morning.” However, you can write, “In this poem,
    Wordsworth presents a speaker who…” We cannot absolutely identify
    Wordsworth with the speaker of the poem, so it is more accurate to talk
    about “the speaker” or “the poet” in an explication.
  2. Use the present tense when writing the explication. The poem, as a work of literature, continues to exist!
  3. To avoid unnecessary uses of the verb ‘to be’ in your compositions, the following list suggests some verbs you can use when writing the explication:
dramatizes
presents
illustrates
characterizes
underlines
asserts
posits
enacts
connects
portrays
contrasts
juxtaposes
suggests
implies
shows
addresses
emphasizes
stresses
accentuates
enables

An example of an explication written for a timed exam

The Fountain

Fountain, fountain, what do you say
Singing at night alone?
“It is enough to rise and fall
Here in my basin of stone.”

But are you content as you seem to be
So near the freedom and rush of the sea?
“I have listened all night to its laboring sound,
It heaves and sags, as the moon runs round;
Ocean and fountain, shadow and tree,
Nothing escapes, nothing is free.”

— Sara Teasdale (American, l884-1933)

As
a direct address to an inanimate object “The Fountain” presents three
main conflicts concerning the appearance to the observer and the reality
in the poem. First, since the speaker addresses an object usually
considered voiceless, the reader may abandon his/her normal perception
of the fountain and enter the poet’s imaginative address. Secondly, the
speaker not only addresses the fountain but asserts that it speaks and sings, personifying
the object with vocal abilities. These acts imply that, not only can
the fountain speak in a musical form, but the fountain also has the
ability to present some particular meaning (“what do you say” (1)).
Finally, the poet gives the fountain a voice to say that its perpetual
motion (rising and falling) is “enough” to maintain its sense of
existence. This final personification fully dramatizes the conflict
between the fountain’s appearance and the poem’s statement of reality by
giving the object intelligence and voice.

The first strophe, four
lines of alternating 4- and 3-foot lines, takes the form of a ballad
stanza. In this way, the poem begins by suggesting that it will be story
that will perhaps teach a certain lesson. The opening trochees and
repetition stress the address to the fountain, and the iamb which ends
line 1 and the trochee that begins line 2 stress the actions of the
fountain itself. The response of the fountain illustrates its own rise
and fall in the iambic line 3, and the rhyme of “alone” and “stone”
emphasizes that the fountain is really a physical object, even though it
can speak in this poem.

The second strophe expands the conflicts
as the speaker questions the fountain. The first couplet connects the
rhyming words “be” and “sea” these connections stress the question, “Is
the fountain content when it exists so close to a large, open body of
water like the ocean?” The fountain responds to the tempting “rush of
the sea” with much wisdom (6). The fountain’s reply posits the sea as
“laboring” versus the speaker’s assertion of its freedom; the sea
becomes characterized by heavily accented “heaves and sags” and not open
rushing (7, 8). In this way, the fountain suggests that the sea’s
waters may be described in images of labor, work, and fatigue; governed
by the moon, these waters are not free at all. The “as” of line 8
becomes a key word, illustrating that the sea’s waters are not free but
commanded by the moon, which is itself governed by gravity in its orbit
around Earth. Since the moon, an object far away in the heavens,
controls the ocean, the sea cannot be free as the speaker asserts.

The
poet reveals the fountain’s intelligence in rhyming couplets which
present closed-in, epigrammatic statements. These couplets draw
attention to the contained nature of the all objects in the poem, and
they draw attention to the final line’s lesson. This last line works on
several levels to address the poem’s conflicts. First, the line refers
to the fountain itself; in this final rhymed couplet is the illustration
of the water’s perpetual motion in the fountain, its continually
recycled movement rising and falling. Second, the line refers to the
ocean; in this respect the water cannot escape its boundary or control
its own motions. The ocean itself is trapped between landmasses and is
controlled by a distant object’s gravitational pull. Finally, the line
addresses the speaker, leaving him/her with an overriding sense of fate
and fallacy. The fallacy here is that the fountain presents this wisdom
of reality to defy the speaker’s original idea that the fountain and the
ocean appear to be trapped and free. Also, the direct statement of the
last line certainly addresses the human speaker as well as the human
reader. This statement implies that we are all trapped or controlled by
some remote object or entity. At the same time, the assertion that
“Nothing escapes” reflects the limitations of life in the world and the
death that no person can escape. Our own thoughts are restricted by our
mortality as well as by our limits of relying on appearances. By
personifying a voiceless object, the poem presents a different
perception of reality, placing the reader in the same position of the
speaker and inviting the reader to question the conflict between
appearance and reality, between what we see and what we can know.

SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT:

The writer observes and presents many of the most salient points of the short poem, but he could indeed organize the explication more coherently. To improve this explication, the writer could focus more on the speaker’s state of mind. In this way, the writer could explore the implications of the dramatic situation even further: why does the speaker ask a question of a mute object? With this line of thought, the writer could also examine more closely the speaker’s movement from perplexity (I am trapped but the waters are free) to a kind of resolution (the fountain and the sea are as trapped as I am). Finally, the writer could include a more detailed consideration of rhythm, meter, and rhyme.

If
you need answers to this assignment, WhatsApp/Call +1 646 978 1313

The post Choose a poem FROM THE TEXT we have NOT studied and write a 3-5 page explication. appeared first on Shrewd Writers.

We offer homework writing services with you in mind. Our homework help service is made to meet your demands, whatever the challenge. Every paper is written from scratch by experts in your field. You can order essays, discussion, article critique, coursework, projects, case study, term papers, research papers, reaction paper, movie review, research proposal, capstone project, speech/presentation, book report/review, annotated bibliography, and more.

Your Writing Help Service in a Nutshell

PLACE YOUR ORDER