3 Journals in Philosophy

The following is a journal entry a student submitted in a past semester. Note what makes this a good entry:

  • It is at least 150 words in length
  • It is written clearly and understandably
  • It shows evidence of thoughtfulness

“The
design argument for God’s existence is interesting to me but I’m not
sure I can fully endorse it. It argues that because there is design
throughout the universe, there must be a universal designer, i.e., a
god, in turn. However, when considering the endless probabilities and
eons that our world has gone through, this argument is somewhat
disproved. We know many different “designs” are merely adaptations, and
often times we, as humans, tend to “see” a design when there is, in
fact, none there (like seeing faces in electrical sockets). The design
argument also does not account for entropy found in nature, and the
general decline into disorder that can be found in many systems – surely
a designer wouldn’t design that? Also, there are the many examples of
natural disasters and tragedies that mar our world, and which place the
idea of a designer in doubt. I like to relate this problem to what we
read in the introduction to Philosophy Made Simple, about the Book of
Job in the Bible. Even a believer in God such as Job had trouble
understanding how a good and almighty God could be responsible for all
the disorder happening in his own life. So again, while the design
argument is interesting, I do see some problems with it, and how it
could be challenged by a skeptic.”

Topic one (pick one)

Select any one of the following topics/questions to write about.

1.
Which of the six big areas of philosophy described by the “Five-Minute
Philosopher” is most interesting to you? What are some specific
questions within each area that particularly interest you, or that you
yourself have wondered about?

2. The “Five-Minute Philosopher”
suggested several specific ways in which the study of philosophy has
value for people living in contemporary society. Summarize what he said,
and discuss whether you agree with him about this. In a time when there
is such pressure to “get a good job,” does a subject like philosophy
really have value? Would you require college students to take it (be
honest!)

3. Plato offers some very specific ideas on what the
“good life” for human beings is, and how we ought to try to conduct our
lives. What are your thoughts concerning his ideas? Does he offer an
ideal for living that you yourself find appealing–why or why not?

4.
Do you agree with Plato that all wrongdoing is the result of ignorance?
What examples help support, and/or undermine, his claim?

5.
Socrates made many enemies by challenging the values of his
contemporaries. Do you think this is a valuable role for someone to play
in society–that is, to challenge others to think about what they are
doing, and why? Can you think of any specific examples of persons who,
like Socrates, have challenged society’s values, and perhaps been
persecuted for this activity?

Second Topic (pick one)

1.
What are your thoughts on Aristotle’s ideal of the “Golden Mean”? Is
this an attractive ideal for living? Do you see any problems in putting
it into practice?

2. Explain how you think any of the
traditional virtues (such as courage, generosity, patience,
self-discipline, forgiveness, etc.) might be put into practice in
contemporary life, or in your own life. Or, what are some specific
examples you can think of (from current events, your own life,
literature, history) of any of these virtues put into practice?

3.
What are your thoughts on Epicurus’ philosophy of hedonism? Is this an
attractive ideal for living? Do you see any problems in putting it into
practice?

Third Topic (pick one)

1. Explain how you could apply Stoic principles in your everyday life.

2. What are your thoughts on the problem of the freedom of the will? Do you see a way to resolve the problem?

3.
What are your thoughts on the “trolley problem”? What do you think the
right thing to do is? What would you personally do if you were in that
situation?

4. Do you think the moral theory of utilitarianism can survive the criticisms of the textbook authors on pages 34-35?

5. Which moral theory do you prefer, utilitarianism or Kant’s ethics of duty (deontology)?

If
you need answers to this assignment, WhatsApp/Call +1 646 978 1313

The post 3 Journals in Philosophy appeared first on Shrewd Writers.

We offer homework writing services with you in mind. Our homework help service is made to meet your demands, whatever the challenge. Every paper is written from scratch by experts in your field. You can order essays, discussion, article critique, coursework, projects, case study, term papers, research papers, reaction paper, movie review, research proposal, capstone project, speech/presentation, book report/review, annotated bibliography, and more.

Your Writing Help Service in a Nutshell

PLACE YOUR ORDER