Why Active Euthanasia despite criticism today

Many people argue that passive euthanasia is more moral compared to active euthanasia. Euthanasia is the active killing of people by a doctor at the wish of the patient. The patient should make voluntary and careful considerations to the doctor, and in a repeated manner to show that the patient is suffering unbearably and does not show any signs of improvements. Euthanasia comes in very many different ways, where every type brings different rights and wrong universitywritings.com . The different types of euthanasia include “voluntary,” “non-voluntary,” and “involuntary.” Where voluntary euthanasia is where termination of life occurs at the request of the patient who dies, and non-voluntary euthanasia occurs when the person is unable or is unconscious to make the meaningful choice between dying or living. Order customized paper on the topic at a reasonable prices on our website . Involuntary euthanasia is the situation where euthanasia happens without the consent of the patient. The voluntary, involuntary, and non-voluntary euthanasia can further be divided into active euthanasia and passive euthanasia.Active euthanasia is the situation where the doctor causes the patient’s death directly, such as giving the patient a drug overdose while passive euthanasia is where the patients are allowed to die without any external factors. The American Medical Association in 1973 adopted the rule of forbidding the act of mercy killing to an incurable patient. Hence, most people have morally established passive euthanasia since they consider this an act of God for willing the person to die. Our company offers services search as editing, proofreading, and writing from scratch at affordable rates. Visit our website for more information!